ARUN TANDON
MOHAMMAD ATEEQUE SIDDIQUI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Arun Tandon, J.—Heard Sri R.N. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Indra Raj Singh, learned counsel for the respondent-Committee of Management and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents in all these connected writ petitions.
2. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 25994 of 2006 has been filed for quashing the proceedings initiated by the Commissioner, Varanasi Region, Varanasi against the petitioners in pursuance to the alleged complaint dated 31st January, 2006.
3. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 31653 of 2006 has been filed for quashing the orders dated 18th may, 2006 and dated 26th May, 2006 passed by respondent Nos. 5 and 4.
4. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 24613 of 2008 has been filed for quashing the order dated 1st May, 2008 passed by the alleged Manager of the institution (Annexure-20 of the writ petition) whereby the petitioners have been informed that there services are being put to an end with the condition that the order would be subject to the decision of Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 25994 of 2006 and Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 31653 of 2006.
5. Facts in short, as are borne out from the records of the present writ petitions, are :
Mohammad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.