SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 2213

VINEET SARAN, RAN VIJAI SINGH
SUBHASH CHANDRA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Swapnil Kumar for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—This writ petition has been filed for issuing a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 11.6.2009 passed by respondent 1 by which the petitioner has been dismissed from service.

2. The facts giving rise to this writ petition are that the petitioner while working as Senior Consultant (Pathology) at Gautam Budh Nagar was served a charge-sheet for preparing a fake medical report with respect to the rape of a lady after taking bribe of Rs. 5000/-. This was revealed during the Sting Operation of India T.V. Consequently an F.I.R. was lodged against the petitioner in Case Crime No. 696 of 2007 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471, I.P.C. read with Sections 7 of 13 (1) d, 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act at police station Noida Gautam Budh Nagar. Thereafter petitioner was sent to jail and remained there for more than 48 hours. Consequently, he was suspended on the ground that he remained in jail for more than 48 hours. Thereafter a charge-sheet dated 10.1.2008 was served on the petitioner in which the petitioner was charged for violation of Rule 3 of U.P. Government Servant Conduct Rules 1956 and also with respect to the preparation of fake inquiry report on t




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top