SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 3824

RAVINDRA SINGH
Yogendra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

Heard Sri V.P. Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Gaurav Kakkar, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P.and Sri Viresh Mishra, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Amit Misra, learned counsel for the complainant and the perused the record.

This bail application has been filed by the applicant Yogendra with a prayer that he may be released on bail in Case Crime no. 70 of 2009, under sections 302 & 307 I.P.C., P.S. Binauli, District Baghpat.

2. The facts, in brief, of this case are that a telephonic massage was given to police station Binauli on 7.3.2009 at about 4.00 a.m. by unknown person that gun shot injury was caused on the person of Ghanshyam Sharma and others, on that information, the officer in-charge of police station Binauli proceeded towards the place of occurrence, the detailed FIR of this case has been lodged by Jagpal Sharma on 7.3.2009 at 5.30 a.m. in respect of the incident which had occurred on 7.3.2009 at about 2.30 a.m., the distance of the police station was about 4 kms., the applicant, co-accused Ghanshyam, co-accused Rajendra, Co-accused Jai Prakash are named in the FIR as accused.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top