Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. The applicant is involved in Case Crime No. 185 of 2009, under Sections? 147,148,323,504, 506308, 304 IPC, Police Station Gosainganj, District Lucknow.

2. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that according to the FIR version there was some dispute between the accused and the deceased person. It is further submitted that the deceased had several injuries on his person. That cross FIR has also been lodged by the applicant side. In the FIR no specific weapon has been assigned to any of the accused person but subsequently in the statement it has come that the applicant was armed with 'Kulhadi'. On perusal of postmortem report no typical wound of 'Kulhadi' could be found. It has further been submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the accused persons including the applicant.

3. The bail is, however, opposed by the learned AGA.

4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, without entering into the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Let the applicant Raju Yadav be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his