VIRENDRA SINGH
Veena Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
Virendra Singh, J.
Smt. Veena Verma, moved this application praying for cancellation of bail allowed to respondent No.2, Sanjay Chaudhari vide order dated 5.6. 2009 passed by Sri Suresh Kumar Srivastava, learned Sessions Judge, Budaun and to reject his bail bonds in Case Crime No. 04/2009, under Sections 386, 511, 506, 509 I.P.C and 67 Information Technology Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Badaun.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 and learned A.G.A on behalf of respondent No.1, State of U.P.
3. It is contended on behalf of applicant that the applicant had lodged the First Information Report 0n 25.4.2009 at Case Crime No. 04/2009, under Sections 386, 511, 506, 509 I.P.C and 67 Information Technology Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Badaun stating therein that the respondent/ accused working as Manager in Urban Co-operative Bank, Badaun fraudulently got signed some blank papers from the applicant in respect to loan advanced to her for construction and thereafter he started harassing her and her husband thereby threatening to commit their murder and further sending some obscene SMS to her fro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.