SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 3615

VIRENDRA SINGH
Veena Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Petitioner Counsel:- Brijesh Sahai, Rajesh Kumar Srivastava
Respondent Counsel:- Govt. Advocate, Sm.G. Asghar

JUDGMENT:

Virendra Singh, J.

Smt. Veena Verma, moved this application praying for cancellation of bail allowed to respondent No.2, Sanjay Chaudhari vide order dated 5.6. 2009 passed by Sri Suresh Kumar Srivastava, learned Sessions Judge, Budaun and to reject his bail bonds in Case Crime No. 04/2009, under Sections 386, 511, 506, 509 I.P.C and 67 Information Technology Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Badaun.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 and learned A.G.A on behalf of respondent No.1, State of U.P.

3. It is contended on behalf of applicant that the applicant had lodged the First Information Report 0n 25.4.2009 at Case Crime No. 04/2009, under Sections 386, 511, 506, 509 I.P.C and 67 Information Technology Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Badaun stating therein that the respondent/ accused working as Manager in Urban Co-operative Bank, Badaun fraudulently got signed some blank papers from the applicant in respect to loan advanced to her for construction and thereafter he started harassing her and her husband thereby threatening to commit their murder and further sending some obscene SMS to her fro








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top