2011 (73) ACC 544
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Uma Nath Singh, Dr. Satish Chandra, J.
Sukanya Devi and others --- Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. and others --- Opp. Parties
Writ Petition No.125 (H/C) of 2011
Decided on : 07.03.2011
Habeas Corpus - Private Detention - Section 97 of Cr.P.C., Section 342 IPC - The court examined the issue of whether a writ of habeas corpus would lie in the case of private detention as provided under the rules. The court also highlighted the duty of State authorities to ensure the maintenance of law and order and to produce a detenue from illegal custody if so directed by a Court. The court dismissed the writ petition with a cost of Rs.50,00,000/- for filing false allegations against a public figure and a young girl, and directed the Director General of Police to produce the alleged detenues. The court also directed the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, to register a case against the petitioner and others involved in the plot to frame the public figure, and banned the display of scandalous information on certain websites.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition was filed for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, claiming the detention of the petitioners through their next friend. The detenues were produced in Court and denied the allegations made in the writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the allegations made in the writ petition were false and scandalous, and dismissed the writ petition with a cost of Rs.50,00,000/- for filing false allegations against a public figure and a young girl.
Issues: The main issue was whether a writ of habeas corpus would lie in the case of private detention as provided under the rules.
Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted the duty of State authorities to ensure the maintenance of law and order and to produce a detenue from illegal custody if so directed by a Court. The court also emphasized the need to protect high public functionaries from being blackmailed by those with vested interests.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed with a cost of Rs.50,00,000/-, and the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, was directed to register a case against the petitioner and others involved in the plot to frame the public figure. The court also banned the display of scandalous information on certain websites.
Uma Nath Singh, Dr. Satish Chandra, J.
Memo of appearance of Sri I.B. Singh, Senior Advocate, with Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate, filed under the signature of learned counsel on record Sri Shiv Chidambar in Court is taken on record.
On 10.02.2011, writ petition No.111 (M/S) of 2011 for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus was filed with the following cause title:
"(1) Sukanya Devi, aged about 24 years, D/o Balram Singh, R/o 23-12, Medical Chowk, Sanjay Gandhi Marg, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P., through her next friend Kishor Samrite, aged about 42 years, S/o Nanji Samrite, R/o Village & Post - Lanji, District Bala Ghat, Madhya Pradesh.
(2) Balram Singh, adult, S/o not known to the next friend, R/o 23-12, Medical Chowk, Sanjay Gandhi Marg, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P., through her next friend Kishor Samrite, aged about 42 years, S/o Nanji Samrite, R/o Village & Post - Lanji, District Bala Ghat, Madhya Pradesh.
(3) Sumitra Devi, adult, W/o Balram Singh, R/o 23-12, Medical Chowk, Sanjay Gandhi Marg, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P., through her next friend Kishor Samrite, aged about 42 years, S/o Nanji Samrite, R/o Village & Post - Lanji, District Bala Ghat,
Madhya Pradesh. -----Petitioners
Versus
(1)State of U.P., through Principal Secretary (Home), Civil Secretariat, Lucknow.
(2)Superintendent of Police, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P.
(3)Station House Officer, Police Station Amethi, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P.
(4)Commissioner of Police, New Delhi.
(5)Station House Officer, Police Station Sansad Marg, New Delhi.
(6)Rahul Gandhi, adult, S/o Late Rajiv Gandhi, R/o 10, Janpath, New Delhi. ----Respondents"
The prayers for relief(s) as made in the writ petition are:
"(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of habeas corpus commanding the opposite parties, particularly opposite party no.6, to produce the petitioners before this Hon'ble Court and set them at liberty;
(II) Issue any other order or direction which it deems fit and proper in the present circumstances, in favour of the petitioners, in the interest of justice, and
(III) Award the cost of petition to the petitioners."
The writ petition is supported by an affidavit sworn in by one Kishor Samrite, Ex-MLA of Balaghat area of Madhya Pradesh who has claimed to be the next friend of the detenues. When the matter was listed on 01.03.2011 for preliminary hearing before a learned Single Judge of this Court, the following order was passed:
"The petitioners claim their detention through their next friend, namely, Mr.Kishor Samrite under the custody of opposite party no.6 since 4th of January, 2007.
Let notice be issued to the opposite party No.6 to submit reply.
List after service report."
It appears that having learnt about the contents of the above writ petition and the order passed therein, the instant writ petition was filed with the cause title as:
"(1) Sukanya Devi, aged about 23 years, D/o Balram Singh, R/o Near Gurudwara Ward No.5 Town Area Amethi, District Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P. through next friend Gajendra Pal Singh, aged about 52 years, son of Jogindra Pal Singh, R/o Near Bus Station Town Area Amethi, District Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar.
(2) Balram Singh, aged about 47 years, son of not known, R/o Near Gurudwara Ward No.5 Town Area Amethi, District Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P. through next friend and remote relative Sri Gajendra Pal Singh.
(3) Sumitra alias Mohani Devi, aged about 42 years, R/o Near Gurudwara Ward No.5 Town Area Amethi, District Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P. through next friend Gajendra Pal Singh, aged about 52 years, son of Jogindra Pal Singh, R/o Near Bus Station Town Area Amethi, District Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.The State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary, Home Department, U.P. Government, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow.
2.Superintendent of Police Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P.
3.Station House Offi
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.