SHRI KANT TRIPATHI
Prince Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
1. Heard Mr. Anoop Trivedi for the revisionist and the learned AGA for the respondent and perused the record.
2. This is a criminal revision against the judgement and order dated 29.3.2010 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Agra (in short 'the Board'), in the case crime no. 365/2009, under sections 201, 411, 302, 364, and 394 IPC, Police Station Tajganj, District Agra.
3. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present revision is being disposed of at the stage of admission.
4. The facts of the case are that the revisionist, who is an accused in the aforesaid case, moved an application for declaring him as a juvenile. On 2.9.2009, both the non-judicial members declared the revisionist as a juvenile against which the criminal appeal no. 168 of 2009 was filed, which was allowed by the appellate court on the ground that presence of Principal Magistrate was necessary in the Board. The order passed by the members of the Board without the presence of the Principal Magistrate could not be said to be in accordance with law. Accordingly the appellate court remanded the matter to the Board for a fresh decision. After the remand, the Board passed the order dated 29.3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.