SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 916

AMAR SARAN, ARVIND KUMAR TRIPATHI
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Petitioner Counsel:- P.N. Gangwar
Respondent Counsel:- Govt. Advocate, Abhay Raj Singh

JUDGMENT:

Amar Saran, Arvind Kumar Tripathi, J.

We have heard the learned Government Advocate.

2. This petition was converted to a Public Interest Litigation by an order dated 5.1.2011 and by order of Hon'ble the Chief Justice dated 21.1.2011 it has been assigned to a bench presided over by one of us (Hon. Amar Saran,J). So far as the original petitioners Sanjeev Kumar and others were concerned after the submission of the charge sheet the Cr. Misc. Writ Petition No. 3322 of 2010 preferred by them was dismissed as infructuous by an order dated 8.3.2011. The names of the petitioners and their counsel was also directed to be deleted and the case was henceforth to be described as ?Re: In the Matter of Matrimonial Disputes.? We now direct the office to assign a PIL number to this petition which is titled as above in place of its earlier number.

3. This Court had issued the following general directions on 26.2.2010 when the original petition was admitted:

1. That when a complainant approaches the police station or the concerned lower courts, with complaints about harassment, or violence against the wife, by the husband and in-laws, except in cases of extremely grave nature or in cases of















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top