SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 3764

SHISHIR KUMAR
Mustakeem – Appellant
Versus
Nagar Palika Parishad – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vivek Saran
R.K. Khare

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Shishir Kumar,J.

Heard Sri Vivek Saran, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Yogesh Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Amit Malik, learned counsel appearing for respondents.

2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the orders passed by revisional court dated 15.2.2008 (Annexure 9 to writ petition).

3. Petitioner submits that he took a property having House no.112 (At present House No.99 ) having an area of 300 sq.metres at the rate of Rs.350/- per month from late Hari Singh in the year 1990 and rent was being paid by petitioner. In the year 1991, respondent no.1 claims that this property belongs to him and Sri Hari Singh has been restrained by the order of the District Magistrate, Meerut from selling out the property. Sri Hari Singh wanted to dispossess the petitioner, then a suit was filed as Suit No.138 of 1999 with a relief that petitioner may not be ejected from property in dispute without following the process of law. Trial court after considering the case has granted injunction order in favour of petitioner. It is also submitted that respondent No.1 has also appeared in the said suit filed his written statement and disclosed that property i









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top