SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1079

PRAKASH KRISHNA
Ram Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Khairati Lal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
J.P.S. Chauhan
S.C.

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Prakash Krishna,J.

The aforesaid writ petition was finally heard and decided by the judgement dated 18-5-2007. This is an application on behalf of the respondent tenant to recall/restore the writ petition to its original number and the judgement and order dated 18-5-2007 be recalled.

2. The said application has been filed on behalf of the respondent tenant on the pleas inter alia that when the case was listed, it could not be marked by the clerk of the respondent's counsel and as such, the respondent's counsel could not appear in the case at the time of hearing. The respondent had no knowledge about the order dated 18-5-2007 and he came to know about the said order only on 25-7-2007.

3. Before considering the aforesaid application, it is necessary to notice the background facts of the case. It is also not out of place to mention here that the learned counsel for the parties had jointly agreed that the recall application and the writ petition, both, may be heard simultaneously as per entry in the order sheet dated 4-12-2009.

4. The petitioner, now a retired personnel from Indian Army, had filed an application for releasing the disputed shop in occupation of the pres






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top