SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1420

2010 (81) ALR 78
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Rakesh Sharma, J.
State of U.P. - petitioner
Versus
The Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Lucknow Division, Lucknow and others - respondents
CIVIL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. 31 (Ceiling) of 1993
Decided on: 26.4.2010

The legal occupation and development of land by the farmers, and the application of Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act were central to the court's decision.

Headnote:

Ceiling Act - Land Dispute - U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holding Act, 1960 - Section 10(2), Section 11(2), Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act

Fact of the Case:

The State of U.P. challenged the judgment and order declaring land as surplus under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holding Act, 1960. The respondents, farmers from Punjab, claimed to have purchased and cultivated the land for over 51 years.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the farmers had legally occupied and developed the land, and the authorities had failed to follow due procedure in declaring the land surplus. The court upheld the orders in favor of the farmers.

Issues: Dispute over surplus land under the Ceiling Act, validity of farmers' possession and cultivation, and procedural violations by the authorities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the legal occupation and development of the land by the farmers, the application of Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, and the failure of the authorities to follow due procedure.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the orders in favor of the farmers.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned Standing counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Virendra Singh who has put in appearance on behalf of respondents no. 3 to 39.

2. Through this writ petition the petitioner (State of U.P) has assailed the judgment and order passed by the Prescribed Authority (ceiling) on 31.8.89 and the order dated 31.1.91 passed by Additional Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow. The Prescribed Authority had allowed the objections filed by the respondent nos. 3 to 36. The Prescribed Authority dealt with objections put forth by the respondent nos. 3 to 38 and passed the order on 31.8.89, declaring that no surplus land was available with the said tenure holders. There land holdings were excluded from operation of the Rural Ceiling Act. The details of the land Gata/plots in respect of 27 objectors situated in village Dhakherwa Khalsa, Tehsil Nighasan, District Lakhimpurkheri have been given in judgment itself.

3. The proceedings under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holding Act, 1960(Old Act) were initiated in the above said village. The formal proceedings under Section 10(2) of the old Act of 1960 were taken against tenure holder Asif Ali son of Ejaj Ali, resident of Lakhimpur Kheri, who has been impleaded as respondent no 39 to this petition. After determination of the ceiling area of Sri Asif Ali the Prescribed Authority declared the total area of 647.26 acres of land as surplus area vide an order dated 27th April, 1963. Details of the land (Khata no, Gata No. and Area) have been given in para 4 of this writ petition. Subsequently, after about 18 years a large number of tenure holders i.e. opposite party nos. 31 to 33 jointly filed an application dated 27.1.81 under Section 11(2) of the Ceiling Act before the Prescribed Authority (ceiling). This application was supported by an affidavit and application seeking condonation of delay was also annexed. It was alleged by the respondent nos. 3 to 33 that they are transferries of the land and Bhumidharas of the disputed land situated in village Dhakherwa Khalsa, Tehsil Nighasan, District Lakhimpurkheri. The sale deeds, which were executed in the year 1961-62, were placed on record. According to them they had purchased the land in dispute from the original tenure holder in furtherance of an agreement to sell dated 25th May, 1959. All of them had claimed that they had paid substantial amount at the time of executing agreement and the possession of the land was delivered to them. Since May, 1959 they have been cultivating and in possession over the land in dispute details of which have been given in the memo of the writ petition. It was emphasized before the Court that the writ petition was admitted on 17th April, 93 and operation of the impugned orders was stayed by this Court. Private respondents (poor farmers) are in possession over the land for more than 51 years and their families are solely dependent on the agricultural income derived from the land. The opposite parties no. 3 to 32 submitted before the Prescribed Authority that all of them possess little land and they are not covered under the provisions of Ceiling Act. Most of them were refugees from Punjab as a result of partition occurred in 1947. They had settled in backward region Lakhimpur Kheri and they are being dispossessed after tilling the same for a long period. It was also submitted by the private respondents that after taking possession over the land their names were mutated in the revenue records. That the land owned Sri Asif Ali respondent no.39 was found to be surplus and the respondent nos. 3 to 33 lands were also clubbed with that of Sri Asraf Ali. They had developed the land by putting hard work.

4. The matter was contested before the Prescribed Authority, the State had examined Lekhpal, Assistant Registrar Kanoongo and placed the records. The Prescribed Authority has allowed the objections and took note of the agreement to sell, with the event of handing over possession over the land to


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top