SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 2744

A.P.SAHI
Ram Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hon'ble A.P. Sahi, J.- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner retired as a class-IV employee from a Junior High School established and run under the provisions of the U.P. Basic Education Act. The institution is run by the Basic Education Board. The petitioner does not dispute his date of birth which is 5.8.1944. Accordingly, the petitioner attained the age of superannuation on 31.8.2004 yet on account of the fault attributed to the authorities, the petitioner claimed that he was permitted to discharge his duties till the month of May 2005. The petitioner, accordingly, received salary for this extended period of performance of his duty as a class-IV employee till May 2005. The salary paid for the said period was sought to be recovered, therefore, a notice dated 16.5.2005 was issued and an order was passed to that effect on 31.5.2006. The said order was challenged by the petitioner before this Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition No.57798 of 2006. The writ petition was entertained and it was found that there was no misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the petitioner and, therefore, the Basic Education Officer was directed to get an inquiry held to fix the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top