SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 3542

2010 (83) ALR 293
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Rakesh Tiwari, J.
Nandu Lal & Others – Petitioner
Vs.
Smt. Puspa Devi – Respondent
Writ - A No. - 29049 of 2009
Decided on : 5.10.2010

Advocates appeared:
Petitioner Counsel:- S.T. Ali, Siddharth Srivastava
Respondent Counsel:- Tarun Tiwari, A.C. Tripathi

Legal representatives entitled to prosecute application further on the basis of their own need in substitution of the need of the deceased.

Headnote:

Rent Appeal - Challenge to orders dated 25-4-2009 and 4-2-2009 - U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972, Section 21(1)(a) - Summary: The court discussed the need for the accommodation, the definition of 'landlord,' and the legal representatives' entitlement to prosecute an application further on the basis of their own need in substitution of the need of the deceased under Section 21(7) of the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged orders related to a release application under U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972. The landlady claimed need for the accommodation for her family and her adopted son's family. The petitioners disputed the need and the legal status of the adopted son.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the legal representatives were entitled to prosecute the application further on the basis of their own need in substitution of the need of the deceased. The court also noted that one of the family members of the landlord had acquired accommodation in his own right, estopping the tenants from disputing the landlord's bona fide need.

Issues: Dispute over the need for the accommodation, legal status of the adopted son, and entitlement of legal representatives to prosecute the application.

Ratio Decidendi: The legal representatives were entitled to prosecute the application further on the basis of their own need in substitution of the need of the deceased. The tenants were estopped from disputing the landlord's bona fide need due to statutory provisions.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and any interim order stood vacated.

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari,J. - Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. The petitioners have challenged the orders dated 25-4-2009 passed by the Additional District Judge Court No.2 Varanasi in Rent Appeal No. 19 of 2009 Nandu Lal and others vs. Smt. Puspa Devi appended as Annexure No.7 to the writ petition as well as the order dated 4-2-2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Hawali, Varanasi in P.A. case No. 58 of 2004 Smt. Duija Devi vs. Chhote Lal and others, appended as Annexure no.3 to the writ petition. The petitioners have also prayed for a writ of mandamus for direction to the respondents not to evict the petitioners from house no. 20/25, Pishach Mochan, Nai Pokhari Ward Chetganj District Varanasi.

3. The facts of the case are that the petitioners claim to be tenant of the house no. 20/25, Pishach Mochan, Nai Pokhari Ward Chetganj District Varanasi since before 1976. The landlady Duija Devi filed a release application under section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 on the ground that the father of the present petitioners namely Chhote Lal was tenant of two rooms at the rate of Rs.200/- p.m. in the aforesaid house. In the year 1976, the family of the landlady was small as she has no issue as such she had adopted one Sanjai who is indulged with anti social activities and now she has become a drug addicted; that is being looked after by one Sagar Pandey and his wife Smt. Puspa Devi who is looking after her as adopted son having four sons and four daughters. The landlady Smt. Duija Devi was 'Buwa' or sister of the father of Sagar Pandey.

4. The house in dispute consists of 7 rooms in which there are five rooms in ground floor, a dining hall, two latrine bathrooms. In two of these seven rooms, the petitioners and their family resides. Whereas the landlord alongwith Sagar Pandey and his family are having 4 rooms and a dining room alongwith two latrine and bathrooms. A room has also given by the landlord to the guard. It was stated in the release application that the family of the landlord is living like animal as there is paucity of space. One of the room has been given by her to the married grand son Gyanu Pandey and in remaining three rooms, unmarried grand daughters, grand sons of the landlady and her adopted son Sagar Pandey alongwith his wife are residing. When she had requested to the tenant to vacate the house, and to assure her that they will be vacating the house within some time, but they did not do so. Though the petitioners have sufficient source of income for taking another accommodation on rent and as such if the tenant shifts to another tenanted house, he will suffer comparative hardship than the landlady and her family.

5. During the pendency of the release application, the landlady Duija Devi died on 4-6-2006. A substitution application was moved by Smt. Puspa Devi for substituting her name in place of Smt. Duija Devi as she had bequeathed all her property in her name by registered will. The substitution was allowed on 9-2-2007 pursuant to the order dated 17-2-2007. After substitution application was allowed, Smt. Puspa Devi filed affidavit setting up need of her family in paragraph nos. 3 to 11 of her affidavit thus :-

3- ;g fd tc nqbtk nsoh us foi{kh NksVs yky dks iz'uxr dejk fdjk;s ij fn;k Fkk rks ml le; mlds ifjokj ds lnL;ksa dh la[;k vYi Fkh] fdUrq vc 'kiFkdrhZ ds ifjokj esa 'kiFkdrkZ ,oa mldk ifr lkxj ik.Ms; ,oa pkj iq= rFkk pkj iqf=;ka gS] ftlesa ls nks iq= rFkk ,d iq=h dk fookg gks x;k gS vkSj 'ks"k vfookfgr gSA

4- ;g fd 'kiFkdrhZ ds Hkou esa Hkwry ij ikap dejs] ,d Hkkstuky; nks 'kkSpky; ,oa Lukux`g gS vkSj izFke ry ij dsoy nks dejs gSa] fdUrq Hkwry ij fLFkr nks dejksa esa foi{khx.k fdjk;snkj gS vkSj ,d dejs esa ,d pkSdhnkj cgknqj usikyh vLFkk;h :i ls fuokl djrk gS vkSj 'ks"k Hkwry ds nks dejs esa izFke ry ds nks dejs esa izkfFkZuh dk mijksDr fo'kky ifjokj fdlh izdkj i'kqvksa dh Hkkafr jgdj thou O;rhr djrk jgk gS A

5- ;g fd mDr Hkou dk ,d dejk fookfgr iq= Kkuq ik.Ms; dk








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top