SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 139

2010 (85) ALR 893
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Anil Kumar, J.
Lata Prasad Swarnkar ( At 2:00 P.M.) - Petitioner
Versus
Addl. Diss. Judge Pratapgarh And Ors. – Respondent
RENT CONTROL No. - 142 of 2009
Decided on : 18.1.2011

Advocates Appeared:
Petitioner Counsel:- Gaurav Mishra
Respondent Counsel:- C.S.C.,Girish Chandra Sinha

The applicability of Section 20(4) of U.P. Urban Buildings Act in determining the entitlement of a tenant to retain the premises in a landlord-tenant dispute.

Headnote:

Small Causes Court Act - Landlord-Tenant Dispute - U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Section 25 of Small Causes Court Act 1884, Section 20(4) of U.P. Urban Buildings Act

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged orders related to a landlord-tenant dispute over a rented property in Pratapgarh. The landlord filed a suit for arrears of rent, damages, and ejectment under Section 25 of Small Causes Court Act 1884, which was allowed by the court. The petitioner filed a revision, which was dismissed, leading to the present petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioner to evict the premises and hand over possession to the landlord by a specified date, while also exempting the petitioner from paying the decreed amount/damages to the landlord.

Issues: Dispute over arrears of rent, damages, and ejectment under Section 25 of Small Causes Court Act 1884, and the applicability of Section 20(4) of U.P. Urban Buildings Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Section 20(4) of U.P. Urban Buildings Act to determine that the petitioner was not entitled to retain the premises due to the construction of a house by a family member in the same city.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with a direction for the petitioner to evict the premises and hand over possession to the landlord by a specified date, while also exempting the petitioner from paying the decreed amount/damages to the landlord.

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Anil Kumar, J. - Heard Sri R.P. Shukla and Sri Gaurav Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner,? learned Standing Counsel for opposite parties no. 1 and 2 and Sri G.S. Sinha, learned counsel for opposite party no.3. By means of present writ petition , the petitioner has challenged the order dated 8.5.1997 passed by Civil Judge ( Senior Division) Pratapgarh in SCC Suit No. 6 of 1996 ( Shanti Swaroop Khandelwal Vs. Lalta Prasad Swarnkar) and also the order dated 29.10.2009 passed by Additional District Judge, Court no.4, Pratapgarh in SCC Revision No. 3 of 1997 ( Lalta Prasad Swarnkar Vs. Shanti Swaroop Khadelwal).

2. In the city of Pratapgarh, there is a house no.25 ? situated? in Makanduganj, Pergana and Tehsil Pratapgarh which is owned by opposite party no.3 ( Shanti Swaroop Khandelwal), the same was given for rent to Sri Lalta Prasad Swarankar. In respect to the same , respondent no.3 Shanti Swaroop Khandelwal landlord filed a suit for arrears of rent, damages and ejectment under Section 25 of Small Causes Court Act 1884 registered as SCC Suit no. 6 of 1996, allowed vide order dated 8.5.1997 by opposite party no.2.

3. Aggrieved by the same , petitioner filed SCC Revision no. 3 of 1997, dismissed vide order dated 29.10.2009 by opposite party no.1 , hence the present revision has been filed before this Court.

4. At the outset, Sri G.C. Sinha , learned counsel for the respondent no.3 / landlord submits that in view of the proviso? as provided? under sub-section (4) of Section 20 of the U.P. Urban Buildings ( Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972? which is quoted as under:-

"(4) In any suit for eviction on the ground mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (2) if at the first hearing of the suit the tenant unconditionally pays or [ tenders to the landlord or deposits in Court] the entire amount of rent and damages? for use and? occupation of the building due from him( such damages for use and occupation being calculated? at the same rate as rent) together with interest thereon at the rate? of nine percent per annum and the landlord's cost of the suit in respect thereof, after deducting? therefrom any amount already deposited by the tenant under sub-section (1) of Section 30, the Court may, in lieu of passing a decree for eviction on that ground , pass an order? relieving the tenant against? his liability for eviction on that ground:

Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply in relation to a tenant who or any member of whose family has built or has otherwise acquired in a vacant state, or has got vacated? after acquisition, any residential building in the same city, municipality notified are or town area."

5. In view of the above, the petitioner is? not entitled to? restrain the premises in question? as the dauther-in law,Dropadi Soni wife of Shiv Kumar Soni , who is residing? with the petitioner? has built a house? in the same city . In this regard , he rely on the averments made in para -8 of the counter affidavit? filed on behalf of opposite party no.3 in which it has been stated as under:-

" At this stage, it is made clear that petitioner, who is doing gold smith business has earned lot of money in last 25 years and he has not even purchased and very valuable land in Mohalla Achalpur but has also built a palatial house in Mohalla Achalpur which was numbered? as House No. 98. The copy of the abstract of entries of Municipal Board record is hereby filed as Annexure No. CA-1 to this Court affidavit. This Khatauni reveals that the petitioner got the house constructed in the name of his daughter-in-law Smt. Draupati Soni wife of Shiv Kumar Soni who is son of the petitioner . The petitioner himself is living alogwith his son, his wife and daughter in law? in the said house and accordingly his name has been recorded in the voter list of Ward no.8 Achalpur, Town & District? Pratapgarh at Sl. no. 991-994. The copy of abstract of the voter list of Achalpur ward is hereby filed as Annexure no.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top