SATYA POOT MEHROTRA, RAJESH CHANDRA
Mumtaz Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru Secy. – Respondent
The petitioner took loan from the respondent no. 4 (Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.) for purchasing a Truck. The petitioner committed default in payment of loan. Consequently, a Demand Notice dated 9th March, 2011 was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner had given reply dated 5-4-2011 to the said Demand Notice dated 9th March, 2011.
2. Copy of the said reply has been filed as Annexure 4 to the Writ Petition.
3. The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition, inter-alia, praying for directing the respondent no.4 (Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.) to accept the balance amount in respect of the loan in easy instalments.
4. We have heard Shri Shiva Kant Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. From a perusal of the Writ Petition and Annexures thereto, we find that Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. is a registered Company under the Companies Act, 1956. The said Company is not a Government Company, nor is covered under the definition of? "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. No statutory duty on the part of the said Company, namely, Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. is shown to have been violated. The transaction between the petitioner a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.