RAKESH SHARMA, J.-Since in both the revisions common controversy is involved, therefore both are being decided by a common order, which is being passed in Civil Revision No. 18 of 2005.

2. Heard Shri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Ashish Srivastava for the revisionists Shri Ram Goyal and Dr. Gopal Krishna Goyal and Shri Ravi Kant, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Tarun Agarwal for the plaintiff-respondent No.1 in Civil Revision No. 18 of 2005 and Shri Manu Khare learned Counsel for the revisionist Shanti Prakash Goyal and Shri Ravi Kant, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Tarun Agarwal for the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 in Civil Revision No. 163 of 2009

3. This is a tenants' Civil Revision preferred under section 25 of Provincial Small Causes Court Act, challenging the judgment and decree dated 2.11.2004 passed by Additional District Judge, (Special Judge, E.C. Act), Allahabad in Suit No. 12 of 1999 jitendra Kumar Gupta v. Shanti Prakash Goyal and two others, exercising powers as Judge, Small Causes Court allowing the suit filed by the landlord, respondent No. 1 herein.

4. The Judge Small Causes Court has decreed the suit and directed to