SHRI NARAYAN SHUKLA
ABHISHEK KUMAR MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Shri Narayan Shukla, J.—Heard Mr.S.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. Through the instant writ petition the petitioner has prayed for issuing a writ of mandamus commanding to the opposite parties, to allow the petitioner to participate in the physical test for recruitment on the post of Sub Inspector Civil Police, Platoon Commander Armed Constabulary Direct Recruitment Combined Examination, 2011, on the basis of eligibility acquired by him prior to the date of interview.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Notification advertising the posts does not disclose any cut of date for acquiring the qualification, rather it provides only the qualification, therefore, the petitioner being eligible on the date of test, is entitled to participate in the same.
4. The last date for submission of application was fixed on 25th of June, 2011. Admittedly the result of the petitioner of B.A.final year was declared on 8th of July, 2011 and the mark sheet was issued to him on 19th of July, 2011. The candidates were required to participate in the physical test w.e.f. 4th of September, 2011 to 22n
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.