SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 2981

SHRI NARAYAN SHUKLA
ABHISHEK KUMAR MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
S.P. Singh for the Petitioner; S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Shri Narayan Shukla, J.—Heard Mr.S.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. Through the instant writ petition the petitioner has prayed for issuing a writ of mandamus commanding to the opposite parties, to allow the petitioner to participate in the physical test for recruitment on the post of Sub Inspector Civil Police, Platoon Commander Armed Constabulary Direct Recruitment Combined Examination, 2011, on the basis of eligibility acquired by him prior to the date of interview.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Notification advertising the posts does not disclose any cut of date for acquiring the qualification, rather it provides only the qualification, therefore, the petitioner being eligible on the date of test, is entitled to participate in the same.

4. The last date for submission of application was fixed on 25th of June, 2011. Admittedly the result of the petitioner of B.A.final year was declared on 8th of July, 2011 and the mark sheet was issued to him on 19th of July, 2011. The candidates were required to participate in the physical test w.e.f. 4th of September, 2011 to 22n









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top