SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 2880

A.P.SAHI
SURAJBHAN SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
S.D. Kautilya for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble A.P. Sahi, J.—The petitioner has come up praying for quashing of the order dated 6.9.2011 passed by the Collector, Gautam Budh Nagar, refusing to entertain the restoration application of the petitioner for correction/rectification of the order dated 7.4.1993 on the ground that the correction sought is time barred, and secondly in view of the orders passed by the High Court and the Apex Court, the Collector will have no authority to carry out corrections in the order dated 7.4.1993 which was subject matter of controversy before the said Courts and has been affirmed.

2. The petitioner has further prayed for a mandamus directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioner’s application dated 22.2.1995 which had been filed for rectification of the order dated 7.4.1993 in terms of the directions of the High Court dated 22.9.2004 passed in Writ Petition No. 31741 of 1998 as referred to in the letter of the State Government dated 13.5.2011.

3. A further prayer has been made that a mandamus be issued directing the respondents not to alter the status of the petitioner’s land in dispute or transfer the same to any other agency. This apprehension has been expressed on the gro





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top