SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 3096

[2011(10) ADJ 716 (DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUNIL AMBWANI AND K.N. PANDEY, JJ.
BRAJ BHUSHAN SHUKLA …Petitioner
Versus
UCO BANK AND OTHERS …Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 20932 of 2006, decided on 23rd September, 2011)

Advocates:
Vikas Budhwar for the Petitioner; Manoj Misra for the Respondents.

Headnote:UCO Bank Officers Employees (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976—Regulations 3(1) and 6(2)—Misconduct—Dismissal—Challenge against—Allegedly, petitioner misbehaved and manhandled a bank-customer—Disciplinary Authority imposed punishment of dismissal—Submission of petitioner that facts of incident as it happened were twisted, to make out allegations against the petitioner, which were not proved in the enquiry—Plea accepted—None of charges were found to be proved against the petitioner—Conclusions drawn by enquiry officer on assessment of evidence are entirely perverse—Impugned findings cannot be treated as misconduct—Impugned orders compulsorily retiring the petitioner and lowering him of three stages from pay are set aside—Petitioner directed to be reinstated—Directions issued. [Paras 28 to 39]

       

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—We have heard Shri Vikas Budhwar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Manoj Misra appears for the respondents-bank.

2. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 16.7.2005 passed by the Asstt. General Manager, United Commercial Bank, Regional Office, Varanasi, by which as a disciplinary authority, he has imposed punishment on the petitioner of dismissal, which shall ordinarily be a disqualification for future employment on charge Nos. 1 and 3 for having mis-behaved and manhandled a customer of the bank; and lowering of three stages from the present pay on charge No. 2 relating to representation made by the petitioner to the Asstt. General Manager, Varanasi and endorsing a copy thereof General Manager (Personnel) Head Office, Calcutta, by name, for non-sanction of overdraft limit to him. The General Manager (Operation.1) (Appellate Authority in appeal) on 6.10.2005 modified the punishment on charge Nos. 1 and 3 to compulsory retirement and maintained the punishment on charge No. 2.

3. The petitioner was initially appointed on 7.6.1973 in the clerical cadre of the bank at Rohtak, Haryana. He was promoted to Junior Management Grade, Scale-1 on 1.7.1980, and in Management grade Scale-2 on 19.12.1997. He was posted as Incharge Extension Counter, Mohaddipur, Gorakhpur on 9.12.2002 and was placed under Shri N.K. Pandey, who is alleged to be junior to him and was serving as Branch Manager. The petitioner was required to perform the supervisory work manually as there were no computers in the branch. Out of the three staff members at the extension counter, the permanently posted incharge got themselves transferred to the main branch. It is alleged that Shri Atma Ram Sharma, one of the previous incharge had attempted suicide and resigned from the bank service. It is also alleged that since the extension branch was having heavy rush of work with more than 70 vouchers per day, no one was prepared to work at the Extension Centre.

4. A charge-sheet dated 30.7.2004 was served upon the petitioner with following allegations :

“Shri B B Shukla (PFM No. 14670) Incharge, S H K I C Extension Counter, Mohaddipur of Gorakhpur Branch had indulged in various acts of omission and commission in the course of his duties for which the following allegations have been levelled against him:

1. (a) That on 29.3.2003, Sh BB Shukla misbehaved and also manhandled Mr Alok Pandey husband of Mrs Ranjana Pandey who came to know the fate of instruments deposited in Current A/s No. 3 ‘M/s Ranjana Interprises’ on 17.3.2003 with him. Before, this Mrs Ranjana Pandey had also visited thrice to know the fate but no satisfactory reply was given by Sh B B Shukla to her rather misbehaved with her on her third visit. Thereafter on 29.3.2003, her husband has to come and Sh Shukla instead of providing customer service for redressing their grievance, resorted to misbehaviour and manhandling with Mr Alok Pandey. Sh Shukla caused hurt and injury to Mr Pandey and tore his shirt also during the course of manhandling. Mr Pandey managed his escape with difficulty from the bank premises. This is most unwanted and serious act on the part of Sh Shukla in the Bank premises with a customer and unbecoming of a bank officer.

(b) Thereafter, Mr Pandey went to Police Station and lodged FIR 60/2003 on 29.3.2003 at 12.30 p.m. against Sh Shukla narrating the whole incident.

(c) Subsequently, Sh Shukla also went to Police Station and lodged FIR on 29.3.2003 at 1.15 p.m. against Mr Pandey.

(d) Sh B.B. Shukla has not reported the above incident to the controlling office and has thus concealed the fact. Not only this, he has acted otherwise to lodge FIR against the customer without seeking prior approval from the Controlling Office.

(e) Aggrieved with the misbehaviour/ manhandling on the part of Sh Shukla, they closed their account on 10.4.2003 with the bank.

2. Sh B B Shukla had represented vide his letter dated 17.7.2003 by addressing to AGM, Varanasi and endor





















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top