SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 1976

PRADEEP KANT, RITU RAJ AWASTHI
YOG NARAIN DUBEY – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
Naveen Sinha for the Petitioner; Singh Vinod Kumar, Balram Yadav, N.N. Jaiswal for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard Sri Naveen Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Bal Ram Yadav for the respondents. The record has been produced by the Bank.

2. The petitioner challenges the order of punishment dated 31.7.2006 by means of which he has been dismissed from service and has been made liable for recovery of amount of Rs. 11,22,265.81 which is to be recovered by initiating proceedings under Section 68 of the U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1965.

3. The petitioner, was initially appointed as Field Officer in U.P. Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank Ltd. (herein after referred to as the Bank), and was later promoted to the post of Branch Manager in the year 1997. While working as Branch Manager there were certain complaints against him which were enquired into. The petitioner was required to submit his explanation which he submitted . However, in contemplation of an enquiry the petitioner was suspended on 1.10.2003. Regional Manager, Azam Garh was appointed as Enquiry Officer. On 2.12.2003 the Enquiry Officer issued the charge-sheet, levelling certain charges against the petitioner.

4. The petitioner in response to the charge-sheet by the application dated 16.12.2003 reques














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top