SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 2834

NAHEED ARA MOONIS
ABDUL SAMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Raj Kumar for the Applicant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble N.A. Moonis, J.—Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant be kept on record.

2. By means of the instant application, the applicant has invoked inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash the order dated 7.4.2011 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Bulandshahar in Misc. Application No. 245 of 2011 whereby the application moved by the applicant under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. was rejected.

3. In a nutshell, the prosecution story is that the applicant who is the complainant filed an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate Bulandshahar on 25.2.2011 with the accusation that his daughter Rehana was married with Yusuf resident of Aurangabad Police Station Bhawanapur District Meerut on 17.5.2011 according to the Muslim Custom and Rites. At the time of marriage, sufficient dowry in cash and kind was given by the applicant. The in-laws of the daughter of the applicant were harassing and torturing for fetching more dowry. The victim went on bearing the brunt of husband and in-laws and was subjected to thrashing and forcing her to fulfil their demand of dowry. The
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top