SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 2403

SHRI KANT TRIPATHI
AKASH GARG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Rahul Jain for the Applicant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Shri Kant Tripathi, J.—This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short “the Code”) for quashing the charge-sheet filed in Case Crime No. 15 of 210, under Sections 420 and 406 IPC, P.S. Civil Lines, District Moradabad.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGA for the State and perused the record and also the summoning order dated 3.6.2010.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the learned Magistrate has not applied his mind to the facts and circumstances of the case before taking cognizance of the aforesaid offences and issuing processes to the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted in the aforesaid order, the Magistrate indicated that he has received the charge-sheet under Sections 420 and 406 IPC against the petitioner. He further indicated that the cognizance was taken and directed the office to register the case and issue processes to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the learned Magistrate no where specified in the summoning order dated 3.6.2010 that he perused the police report (charge-sheet) and the statements of the w






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top