SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 2500

[2011(9) ADJ 38 (NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUNIL HALI, J.
RAMESH SINGH ....Petitioner
Versus
AGRAGAMI KSHETRA VIKAS AGENCY, KANPUR AND ANOTHER....Respondents
(Civil Misc.Writ Petition No. 27164 of 1996, decided on 9th September, 2011)

Advocates:
B.N. Singh for the Petitioner; H.N. Singh, C.S.C. for the Respondents.

Headnote:Termination—Reinstatement—Back wages—Awarded of 50%—Held, setting aside the order of termination would not necessarily lead to grant of back wages—Earlier view has undergone drastic charges—Many factors which would weigh in granting back wages—Petitioner has to prove that he was not gainfully employed during the period he was out of services—Petitioner did not possess any special qualification and as such, he could not claim back wages as a matter of right.

       

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top