SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 2824

[2011(10) ADJ 1 (NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUNIL HALI, J.
DINESH TEWARI ….Petitioner
Versus
COMMISSIONER, GORAKHPUR DIVISION AND OTHERS ….Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 34727 of 2003, decided on 14th October, 2011)

Advocates:
Rama Shankar Misra and Arun Kumar for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

Headnote:(Indian) Stamp Act, 1899—Section 47-A(2)—Stamp duty—Deficiency in—Determination of market value of property—Mode of—Submission of petitioner that mode adopted by respondents in determining the market value is based upon the report submitted by Naib Tehsildar—Market value of property has to be determined as it exists on the date of execution of sale-deed—Market value of said property has been recorded as residential on the date of sale-deed, i.e., 31.3.1999—No power vested in the Authority to assess market value of property which the property may acquire in future—Impugned orders set aside—Matter remitted back to determine market value—Direction issued.

       

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top