SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 111

RAMESH SINHA, AMAR SARAN
SYED ARMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vimlendu Tripathi, A.G.A. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard Shri Vimlendu Tripathi, learned A.G.A. and also record which points of argument submitted by the learned A.G.A.

2. Application was given by Syed Arman, Barrack No. 10, District Jail, Moradabad dated 31.8.2010 to the Registrar of the Supreme Court, New Delhi which mentioned that Section 437A Cr.P.C. made available in the Courts of Uttar Pradesh. This letter was forwarded by the Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India, New Delhi to the Allahabad High Court, Allahabad.

3. The letter mentioned that new provision of Section 437A Cr.P.C. has been introduced which requires that six months’ trial to the prisoners, the Courts released all the accused who are facing trial on bail. In order to facilitate, the accused persons for doing pairvi in their cases so that he could avoid the harassment by the lawyers.

4. It has further mentioned that the Court at Kanpur started interpretation for other case is not followed and that Supreme Court issued directions for releasing all such prisoners.

5. Prima facie, we feel that there is no substance in the interpretation of Section 437A Cr.P.C. by the convicting is to release all the prisoners whose trial is being concl



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top