RAMESH SINHA, AMAR SARAN
SYED ARMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard Shri Vimlendu Tripathi, learned A.G.A. and also record which points of argument submitted by the learned A.G.A.
2. Application was given by Syed Arman, Barrack No. 10, District Jail, Moradabad dated 31.8.2010 to the Registrar of the Supreme Court, New Delhi which mentioned that Section 437A Cr.P.C. made available in the Courts of Uttar Pradesh. This letter was forwarded by the Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India, New Delhi to the Allahabad High Court, Allahabad.
3. The letter mentioned that new provision of Section 437A Cr.P.C. has been introduced which requires that six months’ trial to the prisoners, the Courts released all the accused who are facing trial on bail. In order to facilitate, the accused persons for doing pairvi in their cases so that he could avoid the harassment by the lawyers.
4. It has further mentioned that the Court at Kanpur started interpretation for other case is not followed and that Supreme Court issued directions for releasing all such prisoners.
5. Prima facie, we feel that there is no substance in the interpretation of Section 437A Cr.P.C. by the convicting is to release all the prisoners whose trial is being concl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.