SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 46

VINOD PRASAD
JAI PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ram Niwas Sharma, K.K. Dwivedi for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Vinod Prasad, J.—Jai Pal Singh, solitary accused was convicted by Session’s Judge, Ghaziabad in S.T. No. 183 of 1978, State v. Shahid and others, P.S. Bahadurgarh, district Ghaziabad for offence under Section 396 I.P.C. and was implanted sentence of 9 years RI, while two other accused were acquitted of the said charge, and hence he has come up to this Court, in this appeal challenging his aforesaid conviction and sentence.

2. A resume of back ground facts, stated concisely, shows that on the intervening night between 9/10th September 1977, at 1 a.m., nine or ten dacoits trespassed into Dharam Singh’s (informant, PW1) house from the front door and pounced the informant on the same cot on which he was sleeping, in his verandah, alongwith his DBBL Gun No. 2492. When informant tried to pick up his gun, it was snatched away by the dacoits. At that time Saraswati, informant’s wife, his son Suresh, daughter Sureshbani, and small children were sleeping in southern verandah. Four of the dacoits were armed with country made pistols while rest of them were armed with spear and lathi. Informant raised hue and cry, which woke up his wife Smt. Saraswati (deceased), who also raise




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top