SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 162

R.K.AGRAWAL, B.AMIT STHALEKAR
ARCHANA RASTOGI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kshetrsh Chndra Shukla for the Appellant; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble B. Amit Sthalekar, J.—This special appeal has been filed by the appellant-petitioner challenging the order dated 2.11.2011 passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge, by which his writ petition seeking quashing of the order dated 18.5.2011 whereby the claim of the petitioner has been rejected for being sent for Special BTC Training 2008, and a direction commanding the respondent No. 5, the Principal, District Institute of Education Training (DIET), District Sitapur to permit the petitioner to undergo training in the Special B.T.C. Training-2008 has been dismissed.

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 58479 of 2011 challenging the order dated 18.5.2011 passed by the Principal, DIET, District Sitapur rejecting the representation of the petitioner for being sent for training in the Special B.T.C. -2008. From the facts, as narrated in the writ petition, it appears that another writ petition had been filed earlier by the petitioner being writ petition No. 32986 of 2010, Km. Archana Rastogi v. State of U.P. and others, seeking a direction to the respondents to admit the petitioner in B.T.C. (Special) and (General) Training- 2008. The










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top