2010 (1) AWC 48
(ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT)
Arun Tandon, J.
C.M.W.P. No. 46995 of 2009
Decided on September 17, 2009
Dr. Deepak Bhatiya and others
Versus
State of U. P. and others
Teaching Experience - Recognition of C.B.S.E. Teaching Experience - The court held that teaching experience gained by teachers in institutions recognized by the C.B.S.E. should be considered valid for the purpose of appointment as Principal in recognized Intermediate Colleges under the Intermediate Education Act.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, who had teaching experience in institutions recognized by the C.B.S.E., were denied consideration for the post of Principal in recognized Intermediate Colleges under the Intermediate Education Act due to the non-consideration of their C.B.S.E. teaching experience.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the non-consideration of teaching experience gained in C.B.S.E. recognized institutions was unjustified and directed the State Government to examine the matter and issue appropriate clarifications regarding the validity of such experience for the appointment as Principal.
Issues: The issue involved the consideration of teaching experience obtained in C.B.S.E. recognized institutions for the appointment as Principal in recognized Intermediate Colleges under the Intermediate Education Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the teaching experience gained by regular teachers in C.B.S.E. recognized institutions should be considered valid for the purpose of appointment as Principal in recognized Intermediate Colleges under the Intermediate Education Act, and directed the State Government to issue appropriate clarifications in this regard.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition with the direction for the State Government to pass a reasoned speaking order and take consequential action accordingly.
Arun Tandon, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The controversy involved in the writ petition pertains to the consideration of the experience obtained by the teachers while working in recognized institutions affiliated to Central Board for
Secondary Education, New Delhi (C.B.S.E.) for the purpose of being eligible for appointment as Principal/ Headmaster of the institutions recognized under the Intermediate Education Act. Petitioners have made application for the purpose of being considered for the post of Principal in response to the advertisement published by the U. P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board, being Advertisement No. 2/2008. Under Appendix-A to Chapter-II of the regulations framed under the Intermediate Education Act for being considered for appointment on the post of Principal, a teacher has to be possessed of necessary teaching experience of imparting education to students of classes IX to XII.
3. In the facts of the case the teaching experience required is four years. Petitioners claim that they have been working as regular teacher in the institutions recognized/affiliated to the C.B.S.E., New Delhi for more than four years. However, their applications have not been entertained on the ground that the experience gained while working in the institutions recognized by the C.B.S.E. cannot be taken into consideration for the purpose of Item-I of Appendix-A to Chapter-II of the Regulations framed under the Intermediate Education Act.
4. This Court vide order dated 4th September, 2009 required the Secretary (Education) of the State to file an affidavit disclosing his stand in the matter.
The Director of Education has filed an affidavit before this Court on behalf of the respondent No. 1 as well as on his behalf. In the affidavit the only reason disclosed for not considering the experience gained by the petitioners while teaching in the institutions recognized by the C.B.S.E. is that they are paid salary by the management of the institution from its own resources and for this reason an attempt has been made to equate the petitioners with the part-time teachers appointed under Section 7AA of the Intermediate Education Act, i.e., in self-financing Intermediate College. Reliance has also been placed upon Section 7AB of the Intermediate Education Act, which provides that in respect of part-time teachers appointed under Section 7AA provisions of the U. P. High School and Intermediate Colleges (Teachers and other Employees) (Payment of Salary) Act, 1971 and those of U. P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982 will not be applicable.
5. I am of the considered opinion that the reference to Sections 7AA and 7AB of the Intermediate Education Act is totally misplaced. The petitioners are not part-time teachers. They have been appointed as full time teachers in the institutions affiliated to the C.B.S.E., New Delhi for imparting education to students of Classes IX to XII. Therefore, non-consideration of the experience gained by the regular teachers of such institutions, only because payment of salary is made by the management, cannot be the basis for excluding such experience gained. Even otherwise it may be noticed that Section 7AB, when it talks exclusion of the U. P. High School and Intermediate Colleges (Teachers and other Employees) (Payment of Salary) Act, 1971 and those of U. P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982 qua part-time teachers, it only means that qua payment of salary, appointment and dismissal of part-time teachers appointed under Section 7AA, the provisions of the aforesaid Acts will not be applicable in the facts.
6. At this stage counsel for the petitioners makes a reference to the letter of the State Government dated 16th April, 2004 addressed to the President, U. P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board wherein it has been stated that the teaching experience gained by the candidate while working in C.B.S.E./I.C.S.C. Institutions can
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.