SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 247

SUNIL HALI
SHYAM LAL KANAUJIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
N.D. Shukla for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sunil Hali, J.—Petitioner was working as Sub-Inspector in the Police Department. During tenure of his service career a criminal case was registered against the petitioner in which petitioner has been convicted by the learned Trial Court. On account of filing of the criminal case, he was placed under suspension and had retired from the service after attaining the age of superannuation on 30.4.2005 without initiation of any departmental proceedings. When his retiral dues including Gratuity was not paid, he preferred a Civil Misc Writ Petition No. 25431 of 2006 which was disposed of vide order dated 9.5.2006 with a direction to consider the claim of the petitioner expeditiously. In pursuance to the said direction, respondents have refused to release the gratuity vide order dated 13.8.2006 on the ground that a criminal trial is pending against the petitioner therefore, in view of the G.O. dated 28.10.1980 his gratuity could not be released. It is this order which is subject matter of challenge before this Court.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the pensionary benefits including Gratuity, pension etc. of the petitioner is not being released



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top