SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 86

P.K.S.BAGHEL
RAJENDRA DEO PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Pt. Dharm Narain Dubey for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble P.K.S. Baghel, J.—By way of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order of the Commissioner, Varanasi Division, Varanasi dated 29.3.2005 whereby his Appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act has been dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case leading to the present petition are that the petitioner was issued a Licence for DBBL Gun No. 7500/21. The District Magistrate on 22.9.1998 issued a show-cause notice to the petitioner on the basis of a report submitted by the SHO Saidpur dated 16.8.1998 wherein it was reported that the petitioner’s son Anil Kumar Pandey had shot Ajay Kumar Pandey son of Surendra Deo Pandey a Case Crime No. 343 of 1998 under Sections 147/148/149/307 IPC and another Case Crime No. 229 of 1998 under Sections 504/506/427 IPC was registered. The second case was also registered wherein the incident was between same parties. The petitioner in response to the show-cause notice has submitted his reply wherein he has denied the allegations made in the show-cause notice. His case was that his son did not used the Gun as alleged in the show-cause notice and they were falsely implicated in the said Crime. The District Magistrate was not satisfi
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top