SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 345

S.U.KHAN
MOHD. SHAFIQUE (SINCE DECEASED) – Appellant
Versus
KHATOON BEGUM – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.P. Srivastava and Ashish Srivastava for the Petitioners.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble S.U. Khan, J.—In O.S. No. 680 of 1983 present appellants were defendants. The suit was dismissed on 16.10.1999 by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)/V A.C.M.M. Kanpur Nagar. However, in the judgment some findings were given against the defendants also. Against the said decree plaintiffs filed appeal which was registered as Civil appeal No. 320 of 1999. The said appeal was also dismissed on 16.1.2002 by XIIIth Additional District Judge Kanpur Nagar. Thereafter, defendant also filed appeal against the judgment of the trial Court in respect of findings recorded against him, in the year 2004 alongwith delay condonation application which was registered as Misc. case No. 600/74 of 2004. A.D.J. Court No. 5, Kanpur Nagar on 11.10.2011 dismissed the delay condonation application and consequently the appeal. Against the said judgment and decree this Second appeal has been filed.

2. Even if the argument of learned counsel for the appellants that there was sufficient ground for condonation of delay is accepted still it will not make any difference as the appeal before the lower appellate Court was itself not maintainable.

3. Against some findings in a judgment no appeal o


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top