SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 1771

S.P.MEHROTRA
RAJ BALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ved Prakash Mishra for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble S.P. Mehrotra, J.—On oral prayer made by Shri Ved Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, he is permitted to correct the description of the respondent No. 2 in the array of parties in the Writ Petition as well as in the Stay Application.

2. He is further permitted to implead the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Moradabad Division, Moradabad as party -respondent No. 6 in the Writ Petition as well as in the Stay Application.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed, inter alia, praying for quashing the order dated 25th May, 2011 (Annexure 4 to the Writ Petition) passed by the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Moradabad Division, Moradabad.

4. It appears that an application was filed by the respondent No. 5 alongwith two others under Section 198 (4) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), inter alia, praying that the allotment of land made in favour of the petitioner and others be cancelled as the petitioner and the said persons were not eligible for the said allotment.

5. The Collector/District Magistrate, Jyotiba Phule Nagar, by the order darted 18.4.2011 (Annexure 2 to the Writ Petition)
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top