SUDHIR AGARWAL
KRISHNA PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY/ SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MAINPURI – Respondent
Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—The writ petition is directed against order dated 16.4.1987 (Annexure 8 to the writ petition) passed by Additional Commissioner, Agra Division, Agra in appeal No. 4/86-87 under Section 10(2) of U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as “1960 Act”) dismissing appeal of the petitioner and confirming the order dated 25.2.1986 of Prescribed Authority, Bhogaon Mainpuri rejecting objection of petitioner against declaration of 8.22 acres of irrigated land as surplus.
2. The facts in brief giving rise to the dispute in the present case may be given as under.
3. Rao Balbhadra Singh was the grand father of petitioner who had two sons namely Rao Mahesh Singh and Vir Bhadra Singh. Rao Mahesh Singh had two sons i.e. petitioner-Krishna Pratap Singh (since deceased) (his legal heir as substituted in the writ petition) and Sri Madho Narain Singh. A notice under Section 10(2) of 1960 Act was issued by Prescribed Authority to Rao Mahesh Singh proposing to declare 8.22 acres of land surplus in respect to plot No. 1295. The Prescribed Authority found tenure holder possessing total 26.26 acres of irrigated land hence he declared
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.