SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 1039

[2012(6) ADJ 42 (DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SUNIL AMBWANI AND YOGESH CHANDRA GUPTA, JJ.
U.P. STATE HAND LOOM CORPORATION AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 63810 of 2008, decided on 19th April, 2012)

Advocates:
Counsel :
K.N. Mishra and Abhishek Mishra for the Petitioners; Jyoti Bhushan, Ram Surat Saroj, M.C. Tripathi, Salil Kumar Rai, H.N. Singh, S.C. Pandey, Navin Kumar, C.S.C. and ASGI 2008/2584 for the Respondents.

Headnote:Constitution of India, 1950—Article 338—U.P. Commission for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act 1995—Sections 11 and 12—Complaint—Made to National Commission—Scope of interference with—Cancellation of appointment—Commission failed to take into account that respondent No. 6 was a retrenched supervisors was not eligible to be appointed on the post of Senior Manager (Promotion)—His illegal appointment cancelled by M.D. of Corporation—No order of any judicial forum or Court setting aside the impugned order of cancellation of his appointment—Respondent No. 6 had no qualifications for the post in question—Police officer while investigating the offence of interference in the official work by respondent No. 6 had no authority to make observations on the order of cancellation of appointments—Commission also not vested with powers to exercise the powers of Court—Impugned orders set aside—Direction issued. [Paras 12 to 15]

       

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—We have heard Sri K.N. Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Ram Surat Saroj holding brief for Sri Jyoti Bhushan appears for the National Commission for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes, State Office, Lucknow through its Director.

2. U.P. State Hand Loom Corporation Ltd., Kanpur Nagar (hereinafter called as ‘the Corporation’) has approached the High Court for quashing the orders dated 2.12.2008, and 24.11.2008, passed by the Director, National Commission for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes, State Office, Lucknow by which directions have been given to the Corporation, to allow Sri Braj Raj - respondent No. 6, to sit in the Office of the Corporation, for payment of his salary on priority basis, and to give requisite information of compliance, within five days.

3. It is submitted by Sri K.N. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner Corporation that Sri Braj Raj - respondent No. 6, is not the employee of the Corporation. He was initially engaged as a production supervisor trainee, on a stipend of Rs. 250/- per month, in June 1988, and was thereafter appointed as Production Supervisor w.e.f. 23.9.1991, in the pay scale of Rs. 950-1500/-. Since he is only Intermediate, with certificate in elementary weaving and dyeing course, he was retrenched from the Corporation on 25.4.2004, alongwith about 900 employees, under order No. 840-41, after complying with the provisions of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act. His re-engagement was provided only in case of necessity of his services. One Shri Shiv Ganesh Lodhi, the then Chairman of Corporation, a BSP MLA, passed an order on 21.11.2000, directing the Managing Director of the Corporation, to appoint him as Manager (Production), a post for which the minimum qualification was B.E. Textile Engineering, or a Diploma in Textiles from Indian Institute of Handloom Technology. No action was taken on these orders and the matter was referred to the State Government.

4. It is stated that the then Managing Director, vide order dated 23.1.2006, re-employed respondent No. 6, on the post of Senior Manager (Production) in the pay scale of Rs. 3100-4500/- w.e.f. 13.8.1991. This order was passed, when there was complete ban on appointment, in the Corporation w.e.f. on the Government Order dated 8.10.1991. Respondent No. 6, was not qualified to hold the post of Senior Manager (Marketing/Production), for which the essential qualification is Degree in Textile Engineering or Diploma from IIHT. No procedure was followed in such appointment. Since respondent No. 6 was not eligible to be appointed on the post of Senior Manager (Marketing/Production), the then Managing Director, cancelled the illegal appointment on 25.1.2006, i.e. on the third day of his illegal appointment.

5. Sri Braj Raj, instead of approaching the judicial forum in challenging the order, made a complaint to the National Commission for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Commission’), alleging that he is being harassed, and has not been allowed to work. The Director of the Commission sent a notice to the Managing Director of the Corporation, to submit his explanation. The Managing Director, by his letter dated 12.9.2008, sent a detailed reply, to the Director of the Commission, giving the facts as stated above, and also stated that Sri Braj Raj has unauthorisedly entered the office of the Corporation; tried to forcibly put signatures on the attendance register, and started handling the documents. An FIR was lodged at P.S. Kakadeo, Kanpur on 5.10.2006. It was further reported in the reply dated 12.9.2008, that the Managing Director has never abused Sri Braj Raj. Since his appointment dated 22.1.2006, has been cancelled on 25.1.2006, there was no question of allotting him any work, and paying him salary.

6. In the counter-affidavit of Sri R.D. Chandrahas, the Director of the Commission, it is stated in paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 as follows :

“8. That thereafter a le



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top