SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 1399

DHARNIDHAR JHA, RAMESH SINHA
REENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Pradeep Kumar VI for the Petitioner; Sudhir Mehrotra (A.G.A.) for the Respondents.

Ramesh Sinha, J.

We have heard Sri Pradeep Kumar VI, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sudhir Mehrotra, the learned AGA for the State.

The petitioner Smt. Reena has filed the present petition seeking direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 6-6-2011 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate Sadar, Maharajganj as also to issue a direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondent to produce Smt. Reena before this Court.

2. Before we issue any direction it is pertinent to point out that case crime no. 1610 of 2011 was registered under sections 363, 366, 376 etc. I. P.C. by the father of the petitioner alleging that petitioner was taken and enticed away by Rabdullah son of Habibullah in the night of 3-3-2012 alongwith ornaments valued at Rs.10,000/- and cash in the sum of Rs. 31,000/-. The son of the informant who was coming from somewhere met the accused of the present petition and stopped them but the accused brandished a knife and threatened him of of being killed.

3. It appears that the lady, petitioner was apprehended by the police and was produced before the Sub Division Magistrate, Sadar, Maharajganj. The father of the lady was also present in the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top