Hon’ble Surendra Kumar, J.—Heard Sri Dharmendra Singhal, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Imran Ullah, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 and learned AGA for the State.

2. This criminal revision has been filed by the prosecutrix Smt. Rukumani Devi against the order dated 15.5.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 5, Aligarh, in Session Trial No. 965 of 2007 State v. Ram Wakil and others, under Sections 376 and 506 IPC, Police Station Atrauli, District Aligarh whereby the application 143-Kha moved by the revisionist for discharging her to give the sample of her voice to the voice expert has been dismissed.

3. The relevant facts for deciding this revision are that the case of rape is going on against the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 in the trial Court. In the said Session Trial, evidence of the prosecutrix Smt. Rukumani Devi as PW-1 was recorded and she has been cross-examined at length by the defence side. When the prosecutrix was being cross-examined, the accused persons moved an application in the trial Court and proyed the impugned C.D. in the trial Court with the permission of the Court and asked the prosecutrix as to whether the