SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 1416

[2012(7) ADJ 724 (DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SUNIL AMBWANI AND PANKAJ NAQVI, JJ.
SHIV SEWAK SINGH AND OTHERS ....Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition Nos. 1129, 1455 and 44856 of 2011, decided on 25th May, 2012)

Advocates:
Counsel :
K.K. Roy for the Petitioners; S.M. Shukla, S.D. Kautilya and C.S.C. for the Respondents.

Headnote:U.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1959—Sections 172, 5, 6, 199 to 204, 207 to 227 and 172 to 181—U.P. Municipal Corporation Property Tax Rules, 2000—Rules 3, 4, 4-A, 4-B, 4-C, 5, 5-A and 7—House Tax—Increase in—Sustainability of—Last increase was made in year 2003-04—Petitioners also questioned the adoption of Geographical Information System (GIS) in identifying and calculating the property tax—And also challenged the assessments of house tax by Municipal Commissioner w.e.f. 1.4.2011 and orders passed by State Government dated 21.9.2011 by which Resolution Nos. 340 and 342 passed by Nagar Nigam resolving to increase the house tax only by 2% from 11 to 13% and to cancel GIS Survey report—Property Tax Rules, 2000 provides for the procedural part of the imposition, calculation and realisation of the property tax—Jawahar Lal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) imposes to encourage reforms—Property tax is imposed as a Corporation tax under Section 172 (a) after following procedure laid down from Sections 199 to 223—Contention of petitioners confined only to method and manner of imposition of property tax—Petitioners held not entitled to reliefs claimed—Interference with impugned orders dated 8.7.2011 and 21.9.2011 declined with—GIS Survey not made by Municipal Corporation but made in accordance with JNNURM—Minimum monthly rate of rent as notified by Municipal Commissioner, on 18.6.2010 to be effective w.e.f. 1.4.2011, held valid—Further directions also issued. [Paras 49 to 63]

       Result; Petitions Disposed of.

       

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The petitioners are the elected corporators, ex-officio corporators, ex-corporators of Nagar Nigam and public spirited persons of the City of Allahabad. In these writ petitions, they have questioned the authority, the manner and the process of increase of the property tax levied on the properties situate within the municipal limits of Allahabad by the Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Allahabad for the year 2011-12, under Section 172 of the U.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 (in short ‘the Act of 1959’). (The last increase was made in the year 2003-04). They have questioned the adoption of Geographical Information System (GIS) in identifying and calculating the property tax, the fixation of the annual value of the properties for imposition of house tax, and have challenged the enhancement of monthly rates of rent and assessments of house tax by the Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam w.e.f. 1.4.2011, and the orders passed by the State Government dated 21.9.2011, by which the Resolution Nos. 340 and 342 passed by the Nagar Nigam, Allahabad resolving to increase the house tax only by 2% from 11% to 13% and to cancel the GIS survey report have been suspended. They have also sought the relief to direct the Nagar Nigam to increase its income by imposing legally permissible tax and fees under the Act of 1959.

2. In Writ Petition No. 1129 of 2011, Shiv Sewak Singh and others v. State of U.P. and others, the petitioner Nos. 1 to 5 are the elected corporators of Nagar Nigam. Their term of 5 years has came to an end in December, 2011, during the pendency of these writ petitions. The Petitioner No. 6 is the ex-corporator. They have prayed for writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 8.7.2011 passed by the Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Allahabad by which he has in view of the various resolutions of the Nagar Nigam, with regard to proposed house tax assessment on increasing rates per sq. feet on the basis of GIS and local surveys stayed with immediate effect the increased revised unit area rates applicable w.e.f. June, 2010 and had directed that the unit area rates will continue to be operative on the basis of the previously applicable rates w.e.f. 1.4.2003 on the basis of the informations received by GIS and local surveys. They have also prayed for writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to invite objections from the public at large regarding imposition of new slab of house tax in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Corporation Act and the Rules made thereunder.

3. In Writ Petition No. 44856 of 2011, Shri Kamlesh Singh, Shri Giri Shankar “Prabhakar” and Shri Chandra Prakash “Manga” claim themselves to be active social and political worker espousing social causes for the benefit of the society and for upholding and promoting the peaceful means of civil liberties and democratic way of life, combating the evils of the society and defending the weaker sections of the society and of women and children. They have prayed for similar reliefs namely for quashing the order dated 8.7.2011 of the Municipal Commissioner, Allahabad and for writ of mandamus directing the respondents to charge house tax on the basis of the method prevailing prior to the passing of the order dated 8.7.2011.

4. In Writ Petition No. 1455 of 2011, Shri Anugrah Narain Singh, Member of the Legislative Assembly from City North Constituency of Allahabad, who has been re-elected to the Legislative Assembly in March, 2012, and is also an ex-officio member of Nagar Nigam, Allahabad has prayed for quashing the order dated 21.9.2011 passed by the Principal Secretary, Urban Development, Lucknow, whereby execution of Resolution No. 340 and 342 of the House by Nagar Nigam was prohibited by the State Government. He has also prayed for directions in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to enforce the new assessment of general tax as per GIS survey till the system is implemented fully in accordance with the guideline





























































































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top