SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 1408

S.P.MEHROTRA, MAHENDRA DAYAL
M. S. RANA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
M.S. Rana for the Petitioner; Vipin Sinha, Vipin Rana and A.S.G.I. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The present Writ Petition has been filed, inter alia, praying for quashing the order dated 11.5.2012 (Annexure 19 to the Writ Petition) passed by the respondent No. 3, i.e. the Disciplinary Authority.

2. It appears that the petitioner was posted as Senior Branch Manager M.M.G-3 at Bank of Baroda, Rampur Branch from where he was transferred to Agra. The petitioner was placed under suspension in contemplation of disciplinary enquiry. The Enquiry was conducted in respect of various charges against the petitioner and the Inquiry Officer submitted its Enquiry Report. The Disciplinary Authority, by the order dated 5.8.2004, imposed punishment of removal from service against the petitioner.

3. Thereupon, the petitioner filed an Appeal before the Appellate Authority The Appellate Authority, by the order dated 15.2.2005, dismissed the said Appeal filed by the petitioner.

4. The petitioner, thereupon, filed a Writ Petition being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 30055 of 2005 before this Court challenging the order dated 5.8.2004 passed by the Disciplinary Authority and the order dated 15.2.2005 passed by the Appellate Authority.

By the Judgment and Order dated 30.9.2010, t



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top