SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 1780

RAKESH TIWARI, ANIL KUMAR SHARMA
OM PRAKASH GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
RAGHVENDER VIKRAM SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Pramod Jain for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The present First Appeal From Order challenges the validity and correctness of the judgment and award dated 18.5.2012 passed by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No. 1, Ghaziabad in M.A.C.P. No. 10/2006. The appellant has sought relief for enhancement of compensation as claimed by him to the tune of Rs. 7,20,000/- alongwith interest @ 15% per annum.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant was posted as Special Judge, E.C. Act, Sultanpur, on 9.8.2005 while he was going to Court on his scooter, he met with an accident at about 10.15 a.m. near the entrance gate of the Civil Court. The accident occurred due to collision with the bus bearing registration No. DL IP 6359 owned by Rajendra Vikram Singh. It is alleged that this bus without any passenger driven by Raj Kapoor Mishra had hit the appellant’s scooter from behind near the entrance gate of Civil Court, due to which the appellant fell down with his scooter. Front left wheel of Bus went over the scooter crushing the scooter and causing fracture in the left leg of the claimant-appellant below the knee in Tibia and fibula bones. The FIR of this accident was lodged on the

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top