By the Court.—We have heard Sri D.I. Fareedi, learned AGA on admission of the present Government appeal which has been directed against judgment of acquittal dated 3.5.2010 passed by learned Additional Session Judge/ Special Judge, (E.C. Act), Ghazipur in Session Trial No. 163 of 2008, acquitting the accused respondents of the charges under Sections 498A, 304B I. P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act.

None appears to press the connected Criminal Revision No. 2697 of 2010 filed on behalf of the informant.

2. Suman was married to accused respondent, Raghvendra Tiwari and undisputedly she was at her matrimonial house on 23.12.2007 when she was found having burnt herself after poring kerosene oil inside the room. This appears narrated by the Naib Tehsildar, PW-4 who scaled the wall of the house and went inside the room to retrieve the dead body. He found the doors of the house bolted from inside. The allegation was that after about two years of the marriage, Suman was complaining to her parents and other family members that the accused persons were pestering her for an Alto car as dowry. The learned trial judge has analysed and discussed the evidence of the two witnesses a