UMA NATH SINGH, VIRENDRA KUMAR DIXIT
FALCK INDIA PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Uma Nath Singh, J.—We have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the pleadings of writ petition.
2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner company, inter alia, has prayed: (i) for quashment of order dated 24.9.2011 (Annexure-8) as well as Government Orders dated 11.11.2011 (Annexures 9 and 10) while seeking direction to include the petitioner company in the list of eligible/qualified tenderers; (ii) for restraining the respondents from giving effect to the said orders dated 24.9.2011 and 11.11.2011; (iii) for direction to desist from finalising the financial bid, and (iv) for quashment of the order, if any, whereby the technical bid of the petitioner company was rejected. The petitioner company submitted its bid towards a tender notice published for maintenance of ambulances and to ensure their availability under an scheme called ‘the operation of Emergency Medical Transport Services Uttar Pradesh’ (for short, ‘the EMTS’). It appears that the EMTS has been constituted with the objects namely: (i) to provide fast service in medical emergencies in any part of the State (Urban as well as Rural); (ii) to give first aid and stabilize the patients, and (iii
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.