SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 1402

ARUN TANDON
SANDHYA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Babu Nandan Singh for the Petitioners; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Arun Tandon, J.—Petitioners, who are five in number, claim to have been selected for the post of Shiksha Mitra in the year 2009. However, they were neither appointed as Shiksha Mitra nor were sent for training despite the said selection. In the meantime the State Government imposed a ban on appointment of Shiksha Mitra because of the change in the policy vide Government Order dated 2.6.2010. The scheme in respect of Shiksha Mitra itself has been done away with and by means of the subsequent Government order it has been provided that no further training to Shiksha Mitras shall be provided.

2. According to the petitioners one Sheela Yadav who was also selected similarly like the petitioner filed Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 15796 of 2011 before the High Court. The writ petition was dismissed on 29.3.2011 because of the ban imposed by the State Government vide Government Order dated 2.6.2010.

3. Sheela Yadav, not being satisfied, filed Special Appeal No. 765 of 2011. The appeal has been allowed by the Division Bench of the High Court and it has been held that since selections had taken place earlier in point of time to the imposition of the ban, the same shall not app















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top