SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(All) 238

P.N.BAKSHI
RASIK BEHARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


ORDER

The applicant Rasik Behari is being prosecuted for an offence under Section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. From a perusal of the record it appears that Sri R. L. Trivedi, Food Inspector (P.W. 1) was examined under Section 252, Criminal P.C. on 8-7-1969 and the accused was examined on 22-7-1969. A charge was duly framed against the accused under Section 7/16 of the Food Adulteration Act. It appears from the perusal of the order sheet that on 7-10-1969 in the presence of the accused the Court fixed 22-10-1969 for the prosecution evidence. On that day the witnesses did not come. On an application being made 21-11-1969 was fixed for prosecution evidence. On this date also the prosecution witnesses could not be produced. The date was therefore adjourned to 17-12-1969 for the aforesaid purpose. The case was again adjourned to 7-1-1970 on which date the accused and his counsel were present. The statements of prosecution witnesses Shyam Babu (P.W. 2) and Ram Lakhan (P.W. 3) were recorded under Sec. 256, Criminal P.C. Both these witnesses were cross-examined by the defence counsel. The prosecution evidence was closed and the witnesses discharged. The Magistrate fixed






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top