SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(All) 38

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
K. B. Srivastav, J.
JAMIL HASAN
VERSUS
THE STATE
Criminal Revn. No. 306 of 1973 (Against Judgment and Order of R. C. Bajpai, S.J., Hardoi, D/- 25-9-1973),
Decided On : February 21, 1974

Teeth can be considered an 'instrument' for 'cutting' within the meaning of Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code.

Headnote:

SECTION 326 IPC - GRIEVOUS HURT - INSTRUMENT - TEETH - BITING - CONVICTION - SENTENCE

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, Jamil Hasan, bit off the tip of his wife's nose, causing grievous hurt. He was convicted under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that teeth can be considered an 'instrument' for 'cutting' within the meaning of Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code. The court also held that the sentence of one year of rigorous imprisonment was appropriate.

Issues: 1. Whether teeth can be considered an 'instrument' for 'cutting' within the meaning of Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Whether the sentence of one year of rigorous imprisonment was appropriate.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that teeth can be considered an 'instrument' for 'cutting' within the meaning of Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code because: - Teeth are hard bodies in the mouth that are attached to the skeleton and developed from the dermis or true skin. - The primary function of teeth is to bite food and reduce it into pieces for easy digestion. - Teeth can also be used as a weapon of attack or defense. - Human hands can be used as an instrument for causing hurt and even grievous hurt, and there is no reason why human teeth should be deprived of that quality. - Teeth are commonly used for cutting sugarcane, breaking bones in non-vegetarian meals, or breaking hard shells of fruits. 2. The court held that the sentence of one year of rigorous imprisonment was appropriate because: - Biting or cutting of wives' noses by husbands is quite a frequent occurrence.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the revision petition and confirmed the conviction and sentence of the petitioner.

ORDER

It is not disputed that the petitioner Jamil Hasan bit off the tip of his wife Anisa Bagum's nose by his teeth at about 5 p.m. on October 25, 1970. He was, therefore, convicted under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code by the Munsif-Magistrate, Hardoi and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years. His appeal was dismissed by the Sessions Judge with this modification that the sentence was reduced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has raised two points in this revision the first, regarding the correctness of the conviction under Section 326, and the second, regarding the enormity of the sentence.

3. His contention is that tooth or teeth cannot be considered by any means to be an 'instrument' for 'cutting' and, therefore, a bite by teeth is out of the purview of this section. There is no dispute that the hurt caused was grievous inasmuch as it had brought about permanent disfiguration of face, within the meaning of clause Sixthly of Section 320 of the Indian Penal Code. The question, therefore, is whether tooth is 'instrument', within the meaning of Section 326 which says that whoever voluntarily causes grievous hurt by means of any instrument for cutting, shall be punished etc. Tooth is one of the hard bodies in the mouth, attached to the skeleton, but not forming part of it, developed from the dermis or true skin, their function primarily the mastication of the food. Teeth consist of dentine, forming the body of the tooth, and cement, forming its outer crust, the third tissue, the enamel, when present, being situated between the dentine and cement. The teeth of mammals are incisors, canines, premolars, and molars (See Chambers Dictionary). The description in A New English Dictionary On Historical Principles, Vol. X, Part I. TI-U, 1926 Edition, is as follows :-

"In plural the hard processes within the mouth, attached (usually in sockets) in a row to each jaw in most vertebrates except birds (but also in some extinct birds), having points, edges, or grinding surfaces, and serving primarily for biting tearing or trituration of solid food, and secondarily as weapons of attack or defence, and for other purposes in singular each of these individually.

The word 'instrument' has not been defined in the Indian Penal Code, Websters' New International Dictionary, 1926 Edition, speaks of instrument as that by means of which any work is performed or result is effected; one that is made a means, or is caused to serve a purpose, a medium, means or agent. The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, Vol. I, 1933 Edition, defines it as a thing with or through which something is done or effected; a means, a tool, implement, weapon, a part of the body having special function. In the ordinary primary sense, an instrument has been defined as meaning that by means of which something is done, one who, or that which, is made a means or caused to serve a purpose; the agent or means of anything; and more specifically, the means, or the implement or tool, by which work is done. Now, undoubtedly, the Primary function of human teeth is to bite food, to cut it by the incisors, canine, the premolar and the molar, and to reduce it into pieces and to render it into pulp, masticate, and then let the system swallow it for easy digestion. The purpose is thus biting or cutting. Man uses it as a means or agent for that purpose, that is to say, as an instrument for biting, cutting, gnawing or grinding. But there can be no denying the fact that human teeth can be and are used as a weapon of attack or defence. It is a matter of common experience that urchins usually resort to teeth biting as a weapon of attack and defence. Women in distress, when over-powered and rendered helpless also indulge in the same manner of attack or defence.

It cannot be said that instrument can only mean some mechanical. device, wholly apart from the human anatomy; it may be that, and may not be so. Human


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top