SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 2164

RAKESH TIWARI, ANIL KUMAR SHARMA
SUDHA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
SHASHI BALA SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Umesh Vats and P.N. Saksena for the Appellant; Anoop Trivedi for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Anil Kumar Sharma, J.—Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 21.5.2011 passed by Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Court No. 2, Ghaziabad in O.S. No. 859 of 2006 whereby issue No. 8 regarding payment of Court-fee has been decided against the appellant and she has been directed to pay ad voleram Court-fee on relief-A at Rs. 40.0 lacs.

2. Facts germane to the appeal are that the plaintiff-appellant filed aforesaid suit for declaration that the will dated 16.7.2004 (the 2004-Will) is void, ineffective and had been executed without free will of Smt. Pushp Kirti Sharma and the plaintiff is entitled to get suit property according to will dated 17.1.1991 (the 1991-Will) and the declaration of the Court be intimated to Sub-Registrar, Ghaziabad. The plaintiff further sought relief of injunction restraining the defendant from interfering in plaintiff’s possession over house No. KK-160, Kavi Nagar, Ghaziabad and she be restrained from alienating the house on the basis of the 2004-Will. By way of amendment in the plaint, the plaintiffs further sought declaration to the effect that the 1991-Will executed by late Smt. Punay Kirti Sharma is valid and had been executed by her































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top