Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Sri D.S.P. Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Chandra Shekhar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for respondents were heard. Since pleadings are complete, as requested and agreed by learned counsels for parties, this Court proceed to decide this matter finally under the Rules of the Court.

2. Writ petition is directed against the order dated 26.6.2006 passed by respondent No. 1 and 17.11.2006 passed by respondent No. 2. Copy of the order dated 26.6.2006 is not on record. The order dated 17.11.2006 is Annexure 24 to writ petition and thereby the petitioner has been terminated since he could not be regularized under the provisions of U.P. Regularisation of Daily Wages Appointment on Group ‘C’ Posts (Outside the Purview of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission) Rules, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as “1998 Rules”).

3. The facts in brief, giving rise to present dispute, may be narrated as under.

4. The petitioner was engaged on daily wage basis to function as Ex Officio Stamp Vendor on account of promotion of one Sri Satyavrat Nigam as Deputy Cashier. The aforesaid order was issued by Treasurer, Jaunpur on 28.8