SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 2260

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : VINOD PRASAD AND Y.C. GUPTA, JJ.
ASLAM AND OTHERS ....Appellants
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ....Opposite Party
(Criminal Appeal No. 2600 of 1982, decided on 3rd September, 2012)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Lav Srivastava, A.N. Singh, Dharmendra Singhal, Dharmendra Vaisha, Mohd. Abrar Khan, P.N. Mishra, R. Bhargava, R.P. Dubey, V.D. Ojha, V.P. Sharma and V.P. Srivastava for the Petitioner; G.A., D.R. Choudhary and Sanjay Dwivedi forthe Respondents.

Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Section 302/34—Arms Act, 1959—Section 25—Murder—Common intention—Witnesses were subjected to serious tests in cross-examination—Defence failed to dislodge their allegations—Prompt FIR—No time to manufacture a false story—FIR contains actual narration about incident—Ocular testimonies is corroborated by autopsy report—Injuries inflicted were sufficient to cause death in ordinary course of nature—Conviction upheld.

       

ASLAM vs STATE OF U. P. - 2012 Supreme(All) 2260
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top