SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1553

RAJESH KUMAR
COMMISSIONER, TRADE TAX, U. P. , LUCKNOW – Appellant
Versus
JAMUNA PROSAD JAISWAL. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kunwar Saksena - Respondent.

JUDGMENT

RAJES KUMAR, J. - Present revision under section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") is directed against the order of the Tribunal dated May 30, 1996 relating to the assessment year 1987-88.

On the basis of the information that the assessee - opposite party (hereinafter referred to as "the assessee") has received certain amounts from M/s. IFFCO, Phulpur, Allahabad and M/s. BPCL, Naini, Allahabad towards hire charges, assessment proceedings have been initiated. During the course of the assessment proceeding, the assessee filed the copies of the agreement and explained that in pursuance of the agreement only buses were provided to M/s. IFFCO, Phulpur, Allahabad and M/s. BPCL, Naini, Allahabad for the transportation of their employees from their residence to the factory and from factory to the residence and for which charges were stipulated. It was submitted that the possession of the vehicle was always with him and the entire expenses, namely, diesel charges, salary of driver/conductor, road tax, passenger tax, etc., have been borne by him and at no stage the right has been transferred to the aforesaid two companies to use the buses and








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top