SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 180

OM PRAKASH
VIPIN KUMAR VINAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, SALES TAX, U. P. , LUCKNOW. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Om PRAKASH, J. - This is a revision relating to the assessment year 1978-79 against the Tribunal's order dated February 28, 1989, passed under section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948.

Original assessment on the assessee was made on February 17, 1981. Thereafter, a letter dated March 10, 1983 was addressed to the assessing officer by the Sales Tax Officer (S.I.B.) stating that from the account books of the assessee seized by the Income-tax Department on July 23, 1981, it transpired that certain turnover had escaped assessment, and therefore, he advised the assessing authority to issue notice for the assessment year 1978-79 under section 21 of the Act immediately, so that the limitation might not expire. Thereupon, the assessing authority vide order-sheet dated March 17, 1983, took a decision to issue notice under section 21 and sent the notice accordingly on March 24, 1983. The contention of the assessee's counsel is that when the notice was sent by the assessing authority, no material was before him except the letter dated March 10, 1983, addressed to him by the Sales Tax Officer (S.I.B.) wherefrom he could have reason to believe that some turnover of the assessee had e



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top