Back
1973 Supreme(All) 28
A. K. Kirty, R. L. Gulati, JJ.
BAKHAT RAM TAKHAT RAM AND OTHERS
Versus
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS.
Writ Petition No. 3229 of 1972 connected with Writ Petitions Nos. 3093, 2621, 2752, 2768 to 2771, 2794 to 2797, 2844, 3923, 2845 to 2848, 3307, 3379, 3955, 2983, 2984, 3004, 3005, 3091, 3092, 3094 to 3096 and 3468 of 1972.
Decided On: Decided On : 29-01-1973
R. R. Agarwal, for the petitioners.
The Standing Counsel, for the respondents.
Paddy is a foodgrain and, therefore, subject to purchase tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948.
Headnote:
PURCHASE TAX - PADDY - WHETHER TAXABLE - U.P. SALES TAX ACT, 1948 (U.P. ACT NO. XV OF 1948), SEC. 3-D(1).
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, who are dealers in paddy, challenged the imposition of purchase tax on the turnover of purchases of paddy under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, arguing that paddy was not a foodgrain and, therefore, not subject to tax.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that paddy is a foodgrain, as it is unhusked rice, and that the impugned notification, which levied purchase tax on foodgrains, including cereals and pulses, but excluding certain grains, adequately specified the foodgrains liable to tax by excluding therefrom such foodgrains as were not intended to be included.
Issues: Whether paddy is a foodgrain and, therefore, subject to purchase tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the term "foodgrain" in section 3-D(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, to include rice in its original state, which is called paddy. The court relied on various dictionaries and encyclopedias, as well as commercial and agricultural publications, to support its conclusion that paddy is a foodgrain.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitions, holding that the petitioners were rightly being asked to pay the purchase tax on the turnover of the purchases of paddy.
The judgment of the court was delivered by
GULATI, J. - The petitioners, who are in number, are dealers in paddy. The petitioners Nos. 1 to 26 are millers, who purchase paddy, husk it and sell rice. The remaining petitioners are wholesale dealers who purchase paddy and get it hulled and processed by other millers and sell the rice so produced. They are all registered under the provisions of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. Hitherto paddy was not liable to purchase tax nor was it liable to sales tax. Recently, the State Government of U.P. has issued a notification dated 15th November, 1971, under which the turnover of purchases of paddy is sought to be taxed by the sales tax department. The petitioners have deposited purchase tax in respect of the third and fourth quarters of the year 1971-72. According to the petitioners, they are not liable to any tax in respect of the purchase of paddy and are entitled to the refund of the tax already paid. Hence this and other connected petitions under article 226 of the Constitution.
Section 3-D of the U.P. Sales Tax Act is the charging section under which purchase tax is levied on the turnover of first purchases of such commodities and at such rate not exceeding 2 paise per rupee in respect of the foodgrains including cereals and pulses, and five paise per rupee in the case of other goods and with effect from such date, as may from time to time be notified by the State Government. The Governor of Uttar Pradesh issued an Ordinance, Uttar Pradesh Taxation Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 1971 (U.P. Ordinance No. 19 of 1971). It came into force on 15th November 1971. Section 3 of the Ordinance has amended section 3-D of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The amendment so far as material for our purpose is as under :
"In sub-section (1) -
(x) for the opening paragraph, the following paragraph shall be substituted namely :-
'except as provided in sub-section (2), there shall be levied and paid, for each assessment year or part thereof, a tax on the turnover to be determined in the prescribed manner, -
(a) of purchases of such foodgrains (including cereals and pulses), at such rate not exceeding two per cent.,
(b) of first purchases of such other goods, at such rate not exceeding five per cent., and with effect from such date, as the State Government may, by notification in the Gazette, specify, in relation to purchases by a dealer (whether on his own account or on account of anyone else) or through a dealer acting as a purchasing agent.'"
The Ordinance has since been replaced by U.P. Act No. 11 of 1972.
On 15th November 1971, the Governor issued the impugned notification, which reads :
"In exercise of the powers under sub-section (1) of section 3-D of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 (U.P. Act No. XV of 1948), read with section 21 of the U.P. General Clauses Act, 1904 (U.P. Act No. I of 1904), the Governor is pleased, with effect from November 15, 1971 -
(i) to rescind all previous, notifications in so far as they relate to the goods specified in List I annexed to this notification, and the rate of tax thereon;
(ii) to declare that the turnover of purchases in respect of food-grains (including cereals and pulses), but excluding sawan, kodon, mandua, kisar (or kisari or latri), kisari dal, kakun, manjhari (or ankri), juar, kutu and ramdana, shall be liable to tax under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 3-D at the rate of one per cent., at all points of purchase; and
(iii) further to declare that the turnover of first purchases in respect of the goods mentioned in List II below shall be liable to tax under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 3-D of the said Act at the rate mentioned against each :
LIST I
1. Foodgrains including cereals and pulses but excluding sawan, kodon, mandua, kisar (or kisari or latri), kisari dal, kakun, manjhari (or ankri), juar, kutu, ramdana and paddy.
2. Bristles.
3. Paddy.
4. Ghee.
5. Gur including gur-shakkar, jaggery powder, gur-lauta, gur-raskat and palmyra gur.
6. Jute.
7
